• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Keches Law Group is now the official law firm of The New England Patriots - Learn More

offical injury law firm of the New England Patriots, Boston Bruins and Free Jacks

en_US English
en_US English es_ES Español pt_BR Português do Brasil
Free Confidential Consultation  (617) 898-0808

Keches Law Group

Workers' Compensation and Injury Lawyers

  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Class Actions
    • Employment Law
    • Social Security Disability
    • Accidental Disability Retirement
    • Insurance Disputes
  • Case Results
  • Client Reviews
  • About
    • News & Media
    • Careers
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • No Fee Policy
    • Keches Cares™ Giving
    • Scholarship Essay Contest
    • Attorney Referrals
  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • en_USEnglish
  • es_ESEspañol
  • pt_BRPortuguês do Brasil

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Class Actions
    • Employment Law
    • Social Security Disability
    • Accidental Disability Retirement
    • Insurance Disputes
  • Case Results
  • Client Reviews
  • About
    • News & Media
    • Careers
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • No Fee Policy
    • Keches Cares™ Giving
    • Scholarship Essay Contest
    • Attorney Referrals
  • Search
  • Contact Us

Call Now. We’re available 24/7.

Se habla español

(617) 898-0808

Youth Sports Liability

You are here: Home / News / Youth Sports Liability

June 19, 2013 //  by Keches Law

A man was hired as the head coach of his son’s youth basketball team. The Defendants are the members of the board that oversees the hiring of the town’s basketball coaches for the youth basketball program. Plaintiff was fired from his job because parents of children on other teams complained to the board about the Plaintiff’s coaching style and another parent volunteered to coach. The Plaintiff was given the opportunity to inform the parents of the children on the team that he was stepping down due to work schedule demands. He declined because that was not true. The parents repeatedly asked the board for an explanation as to why the coach was fired, fearing that he may be a danger to their children. The board repeatedly refused to respond with any substantive facts. Eventually, the community took the silence of the board to be an admission that the coach was in fact dangerous, falsely labeling him as a child molester. His son was taunted at school. Plaintiff sued the board alleging gross negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation.

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently ruled in this case, that gross negligence requires indifference to present legal duty, and the Plaintiff had not shown any case that recognizes an independent duty arising out of even remotely similar facts. Therefore, the gross negligence claim has been dismissed for failure to state a claim. Intentional infliction of emotional distress requires an intentional act that is either intended to inflict emotional distress or the actor knew or should have know would be likely to inflict emotional distress, that the act be extreme and outrageous, and that it result in physical manifestations of injury. The jury is entitled to draw reasonable inferences form the totality of the circumstance when determining whether the conduct was extreme and outrageous. The Court ruled that the Plaintiff brought forth enough facts to allow a jury to find that, within the circumstances, the conduct was extreme and outrageous and the intentional infliction of emotional distress claim was allowed to proceed. Finally, defamation requires that, for a libel claim, the Defendant publish a written statement of and concerning the Plaintiff that was both defamatory and false, and caused economic loss or is actionable without proof of economic loss. Words not inherently disparaging may have that effect if viewed contextually. In a similar claim for defamation, the matter was allowed to proceed even without the wording classifying the Plaintiff in a defamatory light. The silence on the matter, along with the reasonable knowledge of the community’s suspicion of the Plaintiff was enough. A jury may be able to find a derogatory meaning in the silence, and thus the defamation was allowed to proceed.

Category: News

Looking for help? or just have a question?

Contact us for a free, no obligation consultation today. It won’t cost a thing and it’s 100% confidential.

Call, chat or email us today.

Contact Us

Previous Post: « Boston’s Taxi Industry and Personal Injury
Next Post: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in Public Schools »

Primary Sidebar

Free Case Evaluation

Call 617-898-0808 for immediate help or fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you ASAP.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Secure Form

[brb_collection id="2306"]

Footer

About Us
Keches Cares™
Careers
Diversity & Inclusion
Scholarship
Attorney Referrals
No Fee Policy

Recent Blog Posts:

  • Gallery: Salute To Nurses 2025
  • Keches Law Group Proudly Sponsors Boston Globe’s “Salute To Nurses” Celebration
  • We Built This City – Celebrating the workers who keep New England going
  • Keches Law Group Celebrates Five Attorneys Listed Among Best Lawyers®

Contact Us

We are available 24/7 by phone

Se habla Español / Portugues
en_US English
en_US English es_ES Español pt_BR Português do Brasil


Office Hours:
Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM

Saturday, Sunday and evening appointments available upon request.

We’re just a call or click away if you need help.

617-898-0808

Contact Us By Email →

Follow Us:


The Official Injury Law Firm of: official injury law firm

  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • ADA Notice
  • Blog
  • Press Releases

Site Footer

We serve all of MA, NH, RI, CT including the following locations: Bristol County including Attleboro, Fall River, New Bedford, and Taunton; Norfolk County including Brookline, Dedham, Franklin, Milton, and Quincy; Worcester County including Fitchburg, Leominster, Shrewsbury, Westborough, and Worcester; Hampden County including Ludlow, Springfield, West Springfield, and Westfield; Middlesex County including Cambridge, Framingham, Lowell, and Medford; and Plymouth County including Brockton and Plymouth.

Attorney advertisement disclaimer: the information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Any information submitted through a form is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Copyright © 2025 Keches Law Group · All Rights Reserved

en_US English
en_US English
es_ES Español
pt_BR Português do Brasil