• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Keches Law Group is now the official law firm of The New England Patriots - Learn More

offical injury law firm of the New England Patriots, Boston Bruins and Free Jacks

en_US English
en_US English es_ES Español pt_BR Português do Brasil
Free Confidential Consultation  (617) 898-0808

Keches Law Group

Workers' Compensation and Injury Lawyers

  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Class Actions
    • Employment Law
    • Social Security Disability
    • Accidental Disability Retirement
    • Insurance Disputes
  • Case Results
  • Client Reviews
  • About
    • News & Media
    • Careers
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • No Fee Policy
    • Keches Cares™ Giving
    • Scholarship Essay Contest
    • Attorney Referrals
  • Search
  • Contact Us
  • en_USEnglish
  • es_ESEspañol
  • pt_BRPortuguês do Brasil

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
    • Workers’ Compensation
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Class Actions
    • Employment Law
    • Social Security Disability
    • Accidental Disability Retirement
    • Insurance Disputes
  • Case Results
  • Client Reviews
  • About
    • News & Media
    • Careers
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • No Fee Policy
    • Keches Cares™ Giving
    • Scholarship Essay Contest
    • Attorney Referrals
  • Search
  • Contact Us

Call Now. We’re available 24/7.

Se habla español

(617) 898-0808

Keches Law Group Workers Compensation Lawyers MA

You are here: Home / News / Keches Law Group Workers Compensation Lawyers MA

March 9, 2012 //  by Keches Law

Social media is becoming a workers’ compensation investigative tool many companies are beginning to capitalize on the value of social media as a recruitment tool. But it can also be useful for other purposes, as long as you don’t overstep legal and administrative boundaries. And one is workers’ comp investigations.

For example, if an employee who files a back injury claim and has strict lifting restrictions posts a photo on Facebook of himself lifting a heavy barbell, that’s a red flag. There doesn’t even need to be a photo involved ‘ an employee who describes his skiing trip while collecting workers’ comp may be setting himself up for trouble.

Jaclyn Millner, an attorney with Fitch, Johnson, Larson and Held and recent co-author of the report Social Networking and Workers’ Compensation Law at the Crossroads, and Carrie McFaul, a Federal Employees’ Compensation Act coordinator for the Army, recently offered tips on how to use social media to evaluate workers’ comp claims.

As Millner explains, attorneys are increasingly searching the Internet to uncover information about injured employees as part of the discovery process. She believes this form of discovery will eventually become customary, and the introduction of social networking evidence in workers’ comp litigation will become routine. Millner suggests it is imperative for workers’ comp attorneys to familiarize themselves with the issues involved in using social networking information in litigation.

Search engines such as Yahoo! and Google can be good sources of information about injured employees and Millner suggests defense attorneys use these routinely, in addition to social networking sites, such as Facebook and MySpace. However, one key is not to rely solely on social media to make a case for workers’ comp fraud.

‘You should still perform thorough discovery and investigation in workers’ compensation matters. This includes requesting medical records, possible surveillance investigations, interviews with coworkers, depositions of the employee and possible witnesses, as well as Facebook/social networking searches,’ Millner said. ‘Usually, Facebook evidence is best used to substantiate some other evidence you have found in your investigation.’

When it comes to using social media sites and whether to ‘friend’ someone to obtain information, the decision depends on whether the person making the contact is an attorney and whether the employee is represented by counsel, according to Millner. Attorneys cannot initiate contact with an opposing party represented by counsel because that violates the Rules of Professional Responsibility. Therefore, she explained, it is unlikely that defense attorneys can friend an employee represented by counsel on Facebook or another social networking site. Even though investigators are not attorneys, Millner said employers should still be very cautious about initiating contact.

McFaul agreed, saying such a practice ‘is not good business.’ She suggests keeping in mind laws and policies that present legal barriers to using social media as an investigative tool, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act security standards. Compliance, she said, is the best protection to future legal challenges.

Privacy issues. Millner points out, however, that a privacy argument is unlikely to prevail in workers’ comp cases because people do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy on social networking sites. Courts have allowed social networking evidence to be admitted for various types of cases, including family law, employment law, and criminal law. Millner says most follow relaxed rules of evidence for workers’ comp, indicating that it is likely that such evidence would be admissible in workers’ comp litigation as well.

If an employee refuses or is unable to provide social networking information to counsel in response to a valid request for discovery, the employer may request this information from the social networking site operator directly. This could occur, for example, if an employee deactivated a social networking account or simply refused to turn over the information. Most social networking websites have privacy policies allowing them to provide user profile information in response to a narrowly tailored discovery request or court order, she said. However, an employee or social networking provider can argue that production of social networking documents is barred by the Stored Communications Act, Millner said. But an exception to the Stored Communications Act is that users can give permission to the social networking site to disclose information relating to their social networking profile, similar to an authorization for medical records provided to a record custodian at a medical facility.

The case law in this area is still very new and fluid. Millner said a key to an effective policy is keeping up-to-date on the latest developments.

Category: News

Looking for help? or just have a question?

Contact us for a free, no obligation consultation today. It won’t cost a thing and it’s 100% confidential.

Call, chat or email us today.

Contact Us

Previous Post: « Lawyers Weekly Submission June 2011
Next Post: Baby Items Such as Bottles, Pacifiers Linked to Thousands of Injuries »

Primary Sidebar

Free Case Evaluation

Call 617-898-0808 for immediate help or fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you ASAP.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Secure Form

[brb_collection id="2306"]

Footer

About Us
Keches Cares™
Careers
Diversity & Inclusion
Scholarship
Attorney Referrals
No Fee Policy

Recent Blog Posts:

  • Gallery: Salute To Nurses 2025
  • Keches Law Group Proudly Sponsors Boston Globe’s “Salute To Nurses” Celebration
  • We Built This City – Celebrating the workers who keep New England going
  • Keches Law Group Celebrates Five Attorneys Listed Among Best Lawyers®

Contact Us

We are available 24/7 by phone

Se habla Español / Portugues
en_US English
en_US English es_ES Español pt_BR Português do Brasil


Office Hours:
Monday through Friday, 8:30 AM to 5 PM

Saturday, Sunday and evening appointments available upon request.

We’re just a call or click away if you need help.

617-898-0808

Contact Us By Email →

Follow Us:


The Official Injury Law Firm of: official injury law firm

  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Policy
  • ADA Notice
  • Blog
  • Press Releases

Site Footer

We serve all of MA, NH, RI, CT including the following locations: Bristol County including Attleboro, Fall River, New Bedford, and Taunton; Norfolk County including Brookline, Dedham, Franklin, Milton, and Quincy; Worcester County including Fitchburg, Leominster, Shrewsbury, Westborough, and Worcester; Hampden County including Ludlow, Springfield, West Springfield, and Westfield; Middlesex County including Cambridge, Framingham, Lowell, and Medford; and Plymouth County including Brockton and Plymouth.

Attorney advertisement disclaimer: the information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. Any information submitted through a form is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Copyright © 2025 Keches Law Group · All Rights Reserved

en_US English
en_US English
es_ES Español
pt_BR Português do Brasil